{"id":93,"date":"2011-12-15T16:06:17","date_gmt":"2011-12-15T16:06:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.oucs.ox.ac.uk\/nexus\/?p=93"},"modified":"2011-12-15T16:09:47","modified_gmt":"2011-12-15T16:09:47","slug":"client-browsers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs-new.it.ox.ac.uk\/nexus\/2011\/12\/15\/client-browsers\/","title":{"rendered":"Client Browsers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One of the most common criticisms of our current Exchange 2007 implementation is that Outlook Web Access gives a second-class service to anyone who dares to use a browser other than Internet Explorer. But it&#8217;s sometimes hard to know if we have a silent majority, happy to use IE, and that we were only hearing from the &#8216;squeaky wheels&#8217; who used something else.<\/p>\n<p>Our uncommon set-up, more akin to an ISP than to a typical business installation, puts us in a position where we&#8217;re aiming to support the widest possible spectrum of platforms. Mandating a standard isn&#8217;t an option and we&#8217;ve done our best to offset Exchange 2007&#8217;s OWA light limitations with a third-party product called Messageware. As a stopgap, it did the job but was an expensive way to offer not-quite-enough in the way of features.<\/p>\n<p>This means that our upgrade to Exchange 2010 is, unusually, therefore driven primarily by giving our users a better experience. But what were our users using? How many would get the &#8216;premium&#8217; feel of Outlook Web App and who would be left out in the cold of the &#8216;light&#8217; version?<\/p>\n<p><strong>What we found<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Internet Explorer (in all its versions) comprised over 35% of our users, Firefox had 27% and Safari (on a Mac) had an 18% share. If you feel that the &#8216;&#8230;on a Mac&#8217; suffix is unnecessary, bear in mind that we apparently have several thousand people (0.7% of the total) using non-Mac versions of Safari&#8230; \u00a0My personal favourite browser &#8211; Opera &#8211; squeezes in with a similar percentage.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs-new.it.ox.ac.uk\/nexus\/files\/2011\/12\/browsers-by-type.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-95 \" src=\"http:\/\/blogs-new.it.ox.ac.uk\/nexus\/files\/2011\/12\/browsers-by-type-300x214.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"265\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"mceTemp\">\n<dl>\n<dd>Client browsers by type<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<\/div>\n<p>But the all-important question was what proportion of our users would actually benefit from this upgrade. So here&#8217;s that pie chart again, with the browsers that can display &#8216;full OWA&#8217; grouped together:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs-new.it.ox.ac.uk\/nexus\/files\/2011\/12\/tier-1-v-rest.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-96\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs-new.it.ox.ac.uk\/nexus\/files\/2011\/12\/tier-1-v-rest-300x235.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"285\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The answer is, reassuringly, pretty much everyone. We should be able to tell our users that 99% \u00a0of them will get the full range of OWA features.<\/p>\n<p>For the remainder our data suggests that they often have access to a second browser which offers the full experience.<\/p>\n<p>One final note on the subject of browsers: Exchange 2010 Service Pack 2 is now released, heralding the return of a feature that&#8217;s been much missed. For basic devices or where speeds are low and data is expensive, the reintroduction of an ultra-basic version of OWA represents a welcome gain.<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;re still debating SP2&#8217;s merits (an early deployment represents added risk during an already busy migration) but we do intend to deploy it, adding &#8216;Outlook Mobile Access&#8217; as another useful way to access email.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the most common criticisms of our current Exchange 2007 implementation is that Outlook Web Access gives a second-class service to anyone who dares to use a browser other than Internet Explorer. But it&#8217;s sometimes hard to know if &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs-new.it.ox.ac.uk\/nexus\/2011\/12\/15\/client-browsers\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":107,"featured_media":94,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-93","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs-new.it.ox.ac.uk\/nexus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs-new.it.ox.ac.uk\/nexus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs-new.it.ox.ac.uk\/nexus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-new.it.ox.ac.uk\/nexus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/107"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-new.it.ox.ac.uk\/nexus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-new.it.ox.ac.uk\/nexus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":99,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-new.it.ox.ac.uk\/nexus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93\/revisions\/99"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-new.it.ox.ac.uk\/nexus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/94"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs-new.it.ox.ac.uk\/nexus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-new.it.ox.ac.uk\/nexus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs-new.it.ox.ac.uk\/nexus\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}